HOT TOPICS :
Gosip | COVID-19 | Ayo Vaksin
|
Thread Terpopuler
-
Senin, 2024/04/24 11:29 WIB
KPU Tetapkan Prabowo Jadi Presiden dan Gibran Wakil Presiden Baru RI
-
Senin, 2024/04/24 11:43 WIB
Mooryati Soedibyo, Pendiri Mustika Ratu, Meninggal Dunia Dalam Usia 96 Tahun
-
Senin, 2024/04/24 11:47 WIB
Ganjar Mengaku Tak Diundang ke Penetapan Prabowo-Gibran
-
Senin, 2024/04/24 16:41 WIB
2 Bule Nyasar ke Halalbilahal, Kesengsem Magelang Sampai Batalkan ke Bromo
-
Senin, 2024/04/24 16:20 WIB
Disebut Prabowo Tersenyum Berat, Anies: Biasa Saja
-
Senin, 2024/04/24 12:17 WIB
25 Makam Nabi dan Rasul Allah SWT
|
Thread Tools |
1st June 2020, 12:22 |
#61
|
|
Mania Member
|
Quote:
Lebih mungkin ada pengaturan score karena kepentingan pemerintah / negara. Contohnya AS, bisa saja bikin laporan besar karena sesuai dengan kepentingan yg diharapkan, walaupun dia negara demokrasi. |
|
I am in a state of acceptance that I accept the rebellious nature of my mind |
2nd June 2020, 01:03 |
#62
|
Mania Member
|
Sepertinya apa yang dibilang oleh seorang dokter terkemuka asal Milan, Italia yang menyatakan bahwa hasil observasi mereka virus COVID-19 sudah melemah di Eropa.
Spoiler
Kemampuan COVID-19 untuk bermutasi secara cepat adalah seperti pedang bermata dua. Di satu sisi membuat COVID-19 menjadi sebuah virus yang sangat berbahaya karena mutasi yang terjadi bisa menjadikannya lebih mematikan dengan viral load yang tinggi, tetapi di sisi lain ini bisa menjadikannya virus ini makin lama makin lemah dalam kemampuannya meng-infeksi manusia. Ada sebuah berita menarik dari Swedia, yang untuk pertama kalinya sejak pandemi COVID-19 menyebar di Eropa, mereka melaporkan tidak ada kematian yang disebabkan oleh COVID-19 dalam 24 jam terakhir. Sweden reports no Covid-19 deaths in 24 hours Sweden has reported no Covid-19 deaths over a period of 24 hours, the first day the Scandinavian nation has been free of fatalities from the virus since March. Swedish authorities have stressed the positive news may be the result of a delay in reporting. Typically, the country has seen a lull in deaths at the weekend for logistical reasons. Nevertheless, the fall in deaths has once again raised questions over the relative success or failure of Sweden's relatively relaxed response to the coronavirus pandemic. Despite recording zero deaths on Sunday, last week Sweden had the highest number of Covid-19 deaths in Europe per capita over a seven day period, data showed. Sweden has reported no Covid-19 deaths over a period of 24 hours, the first day the Scandinavian nation has been free of fatalities from the virus since March. Swedish authorities have stressed the positive news may be the result of a delay in reporting. Typically, the country has seen a lull in deaths at the weekend for logistical reasons. Nevertheless, the fall in deaths has once again raised questions over the relative success or failure of Sweden's relatively relaxed response to the coronavirus pandemic. Despite recording zero deaths on Sunday, last week Sweden had the highest number of Covid-19 deaths in Europe per capita over a seven day period, data showed. There have been previous weekends where the death toll has increased by as little as two, only for a steeper rise to return in the following days when the reporting caught up, the health authority spokesman said. ========== Apakah seperti sebelumnya, angka-angka COVID-19 ini akan naik lagi di Swedia?? Atau, mungkin pernyataan dari Italia adalah benar bahwa COVID-19 memang telah melemah di Eropa. - https://www.thenational.ae/world/eur...ours-1.1027503 |
|
2nd June 2020, 01:13 |
#63
|
Mania Member
|
The world is still far from herd immunity for coronavirus Even in some of the hardest-hit cities in the world, studies suggest, a vast majority of people still remain vulnerable to the virus The coronavirus still has a long way to go. That's the message from a crop of new studies across the world that are trying to quantify how many people have been infected. Official case counts often substantially underestimate the number of coronavirus infections. But in new studies that test the population more broadly, the percentage of people who have been infected so far is still in the single digits. The numbers are a fraction of the threshold known as herd immunity, at which the virus can no longer spread widely. The precise herd immunity threshold for the novel coronavirus is not yet clear; but several experts said they believed it would be higher than 60%. Even in some of the hardest-hit cities in the world, the studies suggest, a vast majority of people still remain vulnerable to the virus. Some countries - notably Sweden, and briefly Britain - have experimented with limited lockdowns in an effort to build up immunity in their populations. But even in these places, recent studies indicate that no more than 7%-17% of people have been infected so far. In New York City, which has had the largest coronavirus outbreak in the United States, around 20% of the city's residents have been infected by the virus as of early May, according to a survey of people in grocery stores and community centers released by the governor's office. Similar surveys are underway in China, where the coronavirus first emerged, but results have not yet been reported. A study from a single hospital in the city of Wuhan found that about 10% of people seeking to go back to work had been infected with the virus. Viewed together, the studies show herd immunity protection is unlikely to be reached "any time soon," said Michael Mina, an epidemiologist at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. The herd immunity threshold for this new disease is still uncertain, but many epidemiologists believe it will be reached when between 60% and 80% of the population has been infected and develops resistance. A lower level of immunity in the population can slow the spread of a disease somewhat, but the herd immunity number represents the point where infections are substantially less likely to turn into large outbreaks. "We don't have a good way to safely build it up, to be honest, not in the short term," Mina said. "Unless we're going to let the virus run rampant again - but I think society has decided that is not an approach available to us." ...If it is assumed that herd protection could be achieved at 60%, that means New York City is only one-third of the way there. And, so far, nearly 250 of every 100,000 city residents has died. New York City still has millions of residents vulnerable to catching and spreading this disease, and tens of thousands more who are at risk of dying. Infections have not been evenly distributed throughout the population, with low-income and minority communities in the United States bearing a greater burden. On Thursday, Gov. Andrew Cuomo of New York announced that antibody testing showed that some neighborhoods in the Bronx and Brooklyn had double the infection rate of New York City in general. Those areas are already approaching the herd immunity threshold, when new outbreaks become less likely. But because they are not isolated from the city at large, where immunity rates are much lower, residents are still at risk. ...In New York City, where 20% of people were infected with the virus by May 2, according to antibody testing, and where more than 18,000 had died by then, the infection fatality rate appears to be around 1%. For comparison, the infection fatality rate for influenza is estimated at 0.1%-0.2%. But the way the government estimates flu cases every year is less precise than using serology tests and tends to undercount the number of infections, skewing the fatality number higher. But even if the fatality rates were identical, COVID-19 would be a much more dangerous disease than influenza. It has to do with the number of people who are at risk of getting sick and dying as the disease spreads... ======= - https://www.forbesindia.com/article/...avirus/59729/1 |
|
2nd June 2020, 09:54 |
#64
|
Mania Member
|
Spanyol pun tidak mau kalah...
Spain reports no virus deaths for first time since March Spain is reporting no deaths in a 24-hour period from the new coronavirus for the first time since March 01June2020 Spain on Monday reported no official deaths from the new coronavirus in a 24-hour period for the first time since March. The development is "very, very encouraging," emergency health response chief Fernando Siman said. Also, Spain recorded only 71 new COVID-19 infections over the past 24 hours, he told a news conference. "We are in a very good place in the evolution of the pandemic," Siman said. "The statistics are following a trend. They are going in the right direction." - https://abcnews.go.com/Health/wireSt...march-70998591 |
|
3rd June 2020, 09:42 |
#65
|
Mania Member
|
'Prof Lockdown' Neil Ferguson admits Sweden used same science as UK Sweden has kept restaurants, bars and many schools open in a much softer approach to virus than other countries in Europe Giving evidence to the House of Lords science and technology committee on Tuesday, Prof Ferguson said he had the 'greatest respect' for Swedish scientists The scientist behind lockdown in the UK has admitted that Sweden has achieved roughly the same suppression of coronavirus without draconian restrictions. Neil Ferguson, who became known as "professor lockdown" after convincing Boris Johnson to radically curtail everyday freedoms, acknowledged that, despite relying on "quite similar science", the Swedish authorities had "got a long way to the same effect" without a full lockdown. Sweden has adopted a far softer approach to Covid-19 than elsewhere in Europe, introducing voluntary social-distancing measures and keeping restaurants and bars and many schools open. As of the end of May it had recorded 4,350 deaths from Covid-19. By contrast, as of Monday there had been at least 39,045 in England. Financial data released in May also suggested Sweden had so far avoided a heavy blow to its economy by shunning a lockdown, its GDP contracting just 0.3 per cent in the first three months of the year, compared to 3.8 per cent across the eurozone. The UK economy contracted two per cent, the sharpest drop since the height of the financial crisis. Prof Ferguson resigned from the main Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (Sage) committee last month after The Telegraph revealed that he broke social distancing rules to meet his married lover. On Tuesday, however, a witness at the House of Lords Science and Technology Committee revealed that he is still helping shape policy, leading a team contributing to one of the most influential Sage sub-committees. Giving evidence to the same Lords committee on Tuesday, Professor Ferguson said he had the "greatest respect" for Swedish scientists. "They came to a different policy conclusion but based really on quite similar science." He added: "I don't agree with it. But scientifically, they're not that far from scientists in any part of the world." Sweden's rate of virus reproduction - the so-called R value - is thought to be at 1, meaning that, on average, every case will cause one other infection. In the UK, it is thought to be between 0.75 and 1, meaning the virus outbreak should be retreating. While pointing out that Sweden's mortality rate is not declining in a similar way to that of other European countries, Prof Ferguson said: "Nevertheless it is interesting that adopting a policy which is short of a full lockdown - they have closed secondary schools and universities and there is a significant amount of social distancing but it's not a full lockdown - they have got quite a long way to the same effect." "That is something we are looking at very closely." . Virus arrived earlier than expected The UK's high death toll is due in part to the fact that Covid-19 entered the country earlier than predicted, and from unexpected sources, Prof Ferguson told the committee. The modelling expert said that genetic analysis has revealed that most transmissions in the UK originated in Spain and Italy. "We had been worrying about import of infections from China... other Asian countries, maybe the US," he said. "But it's clear that before we were even in a position to measure it, before surveillance systems were set up, there were many hundreds if not thousands of infected individuals coming into the country in late February and early March from [Spain and Italy]. That meant that the epidemic was further ahead than we anticipated. It explains some of the acceleration in policy then, but it also explains to some extent why mortality figures ended up being higher than we had hoped." He said the UK was "much more heavily affected" than modellers anticipated, adding: "That's one of the reasons we have if not the largest, one of the largest epidemics in Europe." . Lockdowns are crude Lockdown is a blunt instrument and, when possible, should be replaced with more precise measures that cause less economic damage, the epidemiologist said. Prof Ferguson's comments to the committee could be taken as support for the re-imposition of controls in the event of future flare-ups, a prospect raised by ministers. "Lockdowns are very crude policies and what we'd like to do is have much more targeted controlled transmission going forward," he said. Despite this, he said that the UK's lockdown had been 10 per cent more effective, in terms of reducing contacts, than predicted. His modelling had forecast a 75 per cent drop in contacts, whereas officials believe 85 per cent has been achieved. He revealed that the issue of lockdown fatigue was not something his team had taken into account. "I think the issue of fatigue was not something we ever modelled, some people had that view on Sage but it wasn't one I shared or other modellers looked at," he told the committee. "I think the difference in adherence was that we assumed, for instance, there would be a 75 per cent drop in contacts outside the home. It turned out to be more like an 85 per cent drop, so we're talking about differences but not differences which make a qualitative change to what you predict a policy to do." . Transmission flat until September The transmission rate of the virus should stay "relatively flat" between now and September - but after that it remains "very unclear". In comments that appear to support the current gradual easing of restrictions, Prof Ferguson said: "I suspect though, under any scenario that levels of transmission and numbers of cases will remain relatively flat between now and September, short of very big policy changes or behaviour changes in the community." "The real uncertainty then is if there are larger policy changes in September, of course we move into a time of year when respiratory viruses tend to transmit slightly better, what will happen then. And that remains very unclear." In the same session he said that full lockdown had reduced transmission of Covid-19 by roughly 80 per cent, but that to maintain control that could not slip below 65 per cent. "Going forward, what the models say is that we have limited room for manoeuvre, that this is a highly transmissible pathogen. So we have a little bit of wiggle room, so it will be a learning experience as to how we allow society to resume while maintaining control of transmission," he said. . Care home situation shocking Prof Ferguson declared himself "shocked" at the failure to protect care home residents from Covid-19. He said: "If we had done a better job, or did do a better job, of reducing transmission in closed institutions like hospitals and care homes, we would have a little bit more room, wiggle room as it were. The infections in care homes and hospitals spilled back into the community, more commonly from the people who work in those institutions." Meanwhile, Professor Matt Keeling, from Warwick University, who advises two Sage sub-committees, said the modelling community had "dropped the ball" when it came to understanding the impact on care homes and hospitals. . Contact tracing The Government's new track and trace programme will not on its own solve the crisis, Professor Ferguson believes. "It's not a panacea," he said, predicting that the scheme would reduce the R value by 0.25 at the most. "It depends on not just what proportion of people show symptoms but then what proportion of people can actually identify contacts or portion contacts identified, and then how quickly they're identified," he said. ========= Satu persatu peneliti dan epidemiolog dari negara-negara di Eropa mengakui bahwa metode mitigasi yang dilakukan oleh Swedia patut untuk dipertimbangkan dalam upaya untuk mengatasi penyebaran wabah, paling tidak setelah diketahui cara yang paling efektif dan optimal untuk meng-isolasi para kaum manula. Karena kaum manula tetap yang menjadi korban terbesar dari wabah ini walaupun menggunakan metoda mitigasi yang manapun juga. - https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/202...cience-uk-has/ |
|
4th June 2020, 10:22 |
#66
|
Mania Member
|
Mungkin maksudnya menggunakan metoda mitigasi PSBB longgar ala Indonesia kah??
. . Sweden's Dr. No-Lockdown denies "tactical retreat" STOCKHOLM -- The debate over Sweden's controversial no-lockdown coronavirus strategy flared again after its architect, state epidemiologist Anders Tegnell, appeared to suggest the country's approach had been flawed. "If we encountered the same disease, with what we know about it today, I think we would end up doing in between what Sweden did and what the rest of the world did," Tegnell told public service radio station Sveriges Radio in an interview broadcast Wednesday. "Clearly there is room for improvement." Opponents immediately seized on the comments and used them to round on Tegnell and the Public Health Agency he represents. "This is a particularly astonishing statement," Jimmie Akesson, leader of the far-right Sweden Democrats, said in a tweet. "For months, critics have been consistently dismissed ... and now suddenly this." Lena Einhorn, an author, virologist and high-profile critic of the Swedish approach, said Tegnell's comments appeared to be "a bit of a tactical retreat." However, at his daily press briefing in Stockholm, Tegnell pushed back against the idea that he was changing tack and reiterated his view that Sweden's overall strategy had been correct. "We continue to believe the strategy is good but then there are always improvements we can make," he told reporters. The flare-up reflects the heightened interest in Sweden's unique approach to tackling coronavirus and whether its light-touch strategy -- it left schools and businesses open and people have been largely free to move around -- will prove a wise move or a damaging mistake over the long term. Speaking to POLITICO after the news conference, Tegnell said his comment that a revised solution would be "between what Sweden did and the rest of the world did" did not represent an about-face, but merely that countries should be willing to learn from each other and improve their approaches. "If you ask my colleagues in any country, they would probably say the same thing," Tegnell said. "If we knew a lot more today, our strategies would have been slightly different." ...Tegnell remained positive, saying that he believes Sweden remains better placed than some of its neighbors ahead of a possible second wave of coronavirus which experts fear could sweep Europe. "We are looking at our models and it looks like a second wave in Stockholm would be very small," he said. "In other parts of the country, where we have had much less of a spread, there might a bit more of a wave but still at a low level because there are not so many people living there." He estimated that between 20 and 25 percent of people in Stockholm could now be immune to the virus and that Sweden as a whole could be better-placed than Norway and Finland. "If this disease behaves like other similar diseases, I would say that Sweden should be in a better position because we know that the background immunity will affect the speed of the spread," he said. ========= . . Sepertinya yang dilakukan pemerintah Indonesia yang mengambil jalan tengah, tidak selonggar Swedia dan tidak juga seketat Italia, adalah jalan yang lebih baik. Berbagai studi menemukan bahwa "total lockdown" punya banyak efek-efek negatifnya, baik di segi ekonomi, kesehatan maupun kejiwaan. Dan, prinsip melakukan "total lockdown" memang seperti bertabrakan dengan nilai-nilai kebebasan dan HAM. Ini menyebabkan mitigasi ekstrem "total lockdown" seperti ini sulit untuk diterapkan di negara-negara demokratis, karena setiap orang punya level dan kriteria yang berbeda-beda tentang apa yang namanya "hak" dan apa yang namanya "kewajiban". Sehingga mudah untuk di-politisir. Kita lihat saja contoh ekstrem di USA, masalah memakai atau tidak memakai masker pun malah bisa dijadikan ajang perseteruan politis orang banyak. Di dalam segala bentuk ketidak-pastian, kekhawatiran dan ketakutan massal yang sedang berlangsung sekarang, mengambil jalan tengah mungkin memang yang terbaik, termasuk dalam memitigasi penyebaran COVID-19 ini. - https://www.politico.com/news/2020/0...retreat-298968 |
|
4th June 2020, 11:50 |
#67
|
|
Mania Member
|
Quote:
Saat ini dapat dibayangkan yang terbaik adalah BISNIS TETAP BUKA, tapi protokol kesehatan ketat, kira2 seperti itu. |
|
I am in a state of acceptance that I accept the rebellious nature of my mind |
4th June 2020, 19:58 |
#68
|
|
Mania Member
|
Quote:
Bali saja yang nggak PSBB sudah ancur2an gitu loh. apalagi beritanya , aturan jaga jarak untuk angkutan publik dinegara yang lebih maju pun nggak mungkin dilaksanakan. |
|
10th June 2020, 15:39 |
#69
|
Mania Member
|
Sweden's lockdown paradox Policymakers shouldn't focus on differences in restrictions but on common causes of death. For the past two months, journalists and commentators have made a cottage industry out of comparisons between the respective COVID-19 mitigation strategies of Sweden and Norway. The two Scandinavian neighbors adopted contrasting approaches to the pandemic, with Norway imposing a lockdown similar to most other European countries and Sweden opting for a lighter-touch strategy based on voluntary social distancing and the attainment of herd immunity. The point of such comparisons usually entails citing Norway's relatively low COVID-19 mortality rate (44 deaths per million people as of writing) as a vindication of the lockdown approach, whereas Sweden's higher toll (442 deaths per million) allegedly illustrates the failure of shirking international political trends. Sweden's mortality rate, of course, is comparable to or better than several other European countries with heavy-handed lockdowns including France, Italy, Spain, the United Kingdom and Belgium. Yet its geographical neighbor serves as the most common point of contrast to indict the country for bucking the shelter-in-place convention. Let's consider another comparison -- one that has largely escaped the attention of experts and armchair epidemiologists alike. With 820 COVID-19 deaths per million residents, Belgium is currently the most severely afflicted nation on earth on a per capita basis. Belgium also has one of the most severe and longest-lasting COVID-19 response policies in Europe. The Belgian government first issued warnings against travel to coronavirus-infected regions in early February, moved to cancel large events and gatherings on March 10, imposed wide-scale restaurant and school closures on March 13, imposed shelter-in-place for nonessential activities on March 17, and shut its borders to nonessential travel on March 20. "Emerging statistical patterns show that acute outbreaks in care facilities account for as many as half of all COVID-related deaths in several European countries..." Belgium's restrictions were among the most severe in the region, prohibiting the sale of non-food and nonessential items in stores and restricting grocery shopping to one person per family. These containment measures have only relaxed in the last few weeks as part of a heavily regulated reopening process. As a point of contrast, consider how the pandemic has played out in Belgium's low country neighbor, the Netherlands. Like Sweden and Norway, Belgium and the Netherlands share a common geography and closely intertwined history. The Netherlands controlled a sizable portion of Belgium's current territory prior to the latter's independence in 1830, and Flemish, a Dutch dialect, remains the largest language group in Belgium today. The Netherlands and Belgium also rank eighth and ninth respectively in population density among European states, displaying relatively similar distributions around their main urban centers. Compared with the Belgians, the Dutch have weathered the crisis relatively well. At 348 deaths per million, the Netherlands has experienced less than half of its neighbor's mortality rate. The country also adopted a shorter and milder pandemic mitigation strategy, including initially pursuing a "herd immunity" strategy similar to Sweden. The Dutch government switched to stricter lockdowns on March 23, placing it about a week behind Belgium. Although its policies included canceling large events and shuttering schools and dine-in restaurants, the government's "intelligent lockdown" policy allowed most clothing retailers, toy stores and most other businesses to remain open, provided that they followed social-distancing guidelines. Based on the same line of reasoning that routinely proclaims Sweden's light-touch approach a failure by way of comparison with Norway, one might just as easily conclude the opposite about Belgium and the Netherlands, that the former's lockdown strategy is a failure. The truth however is that neither comparison sheds much light on the real challenges in tackling the coronavirus crisis. Whether one uses Norway to condemn Sweden's light-touch approach and vindicate the lockdowns, or the Netherlands to decry Belgium's heavy-handed restrictions, they amount to little more than cherry-picked comparisons designed to highlight or deprecate a specific policy approach -- often for purely political reasons. Instead, policymakers should pay closer attention to an area of the COVID-19 response where most countries have clearly failed. Despite taking dramatically different approaches over the decision to lockdown, Sweden and Belgium have both seen their nursing home populations ravaged by the disease. Indeed, a similar story has played out in most other European nations. Although the data quality varies (Belgium's government, for example, claims that its atypically high death rates reflect a more comprehensive approach to recording fatalities in nursing homes), emerging statistical patterns show that acute outbreaks in care facilities account for as many as half of all COVID-related deaths in several European countries. All the more astounding, this clear pattern of nursing home outbreaks appears to be largely unaccounted for in one of the leading epidemiology models that governments relied upon to impose the lockdown strategy. The push for COVID-19 shelter-in-place policies stems from a set of models that purport to predict the transmission of a disease based on the level of social interactions that occur under different policy scenarios. Examples include the now-famous Imperial College London model of the U.K. and its adaptations to other countries (including Sweden), all of which operate on the premise that restricting social movement will curtail the transmission of a viral disease. But while models of this type propose a suite of policy options, including lockdowns, school closures, event cancelations and social-distancing mandates, they offer little advice when it comes to acute outbreaks in nursing homes and similar facilities. Indeed, as the Imperial College team acknowledged in its original 2006 model, "lack of data prevent us from reliably modelling transmission in the important contexts of residential institutions (for example, care homes, prisons) and health care settings." The nursing home situation presents policymakers with a set of uncomfortable facts, because it cuts across almost all European countries, irrespective of the severity of their social and economic restrictions. A key factor in COVID-19's deadliness may therefore have very little to do with society-wide countermeasures such as lockdowns and everything to do with particular locations and settings that increase "super-spreader" transmission risks. Rather than waste time arguing about the differences in lockdown policies, which seem to have variable effectiveness, at best, policymakers should focus on common challenges like the acute vulnerability of nursing homes. It's efforts in these areas that are likely to save the greatest number of lives as the pandemic continues. - https://www.politico.eu/article/swed...kdown-paradox/ |
|
detikNews
- detikNews · Berita · Internasional · Kolom · Wawancara · Lapsus · Tokoh · Pro Kontra · Profil · Indeks
- detikSport · Basket · MotoGP · F1 · Raket · Sepakbola · Sport Lain · Galeri · Profil · Fans Area · Indeks
- Sepakbola · Italia · Inggris · Spanyol · Jerman · Indonesia · Uefa · Bola Dunia · Fans Area · Indeks
- detikOto · Mobil · Motor · Modifikasi · Tips & Trik · Konsultasi · Komunitas · OtoTest · Galeri · Video · Forum · Indeks
- detikHot · Celebs · Music · Movie · Art · Gallery · Profile · KPOP · Forum · Indeks
- detikInet · News · Gadget · Games · Fotostop · Klinik IT · Ngopi · Produk Pilihan · Forum · Indeks
- detikFinance · Ekonomi Bisnis · Finansial · Properti · Energi · Industri · Sosok · Peluang Usaha · Pajak · Konsultasi · Foto · TV · Indeks
- detikHealth · Health News · Sexual Health · Diet · Ibu & Anak · Konsultasi · Health Calculator · Foto Balita · Bank Nama Bayi
- detikTravel · Travel News · Destinations · Photos · d'Trips · Hotels · Flights · ACI · d'Travelers Stories
- Wolipop · Fashion · Photos · Beauty · Love & Sex · Home & Family · Wedding · Entertainment · Sale & Shop · Hot Guide · d'Lounge · Indeks
- detikFood · Resep · Tempat Makan · Kabar Kuliner · Halal · Komunitas · Forum · Konsultasi · Galeri · Indeks
- detikSurabaya · Berita · Bisnis · Society · Foto · TV · Indeks
- detikBandung · News · Sosok · Info · Pengalaman Anda · Lifestyle · Iklan Baris · Foto · TV · Info Iklan · Forum · Indeks
Iklan Baris · Blog · Forum · adPoint · Seremonia · Sindikasi · Info Iklan · Suara Pembaca · Surat dari Buncit · detikTV · Cari Alamat
Copyright © 2019 detikcom, All Rights Reserved · Redaksi · Pedoman Media Siber · Karir · Kotak Pos · Info Iklan · Disclaimer